Author Topic: customize the view of iptc stationary pad  (Read 3804 times)

Offline Brendan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 358
    • View Profile
customize the view of iptc stationary pad
« on: November 01, 2007, 01:43:01 PM »
hello!
I guess I had this question already seen here, but I dont find it anymore...

How is it possible to make the IPTC Stationary pad smaller by masking some unused fields like some XMP-only-fields (not all!), Transmission Ref. etc...

thanks & greets
brendan
using the latest version of PM on win10

Offline Kirk Baker

  • Senior Software Engineer
  • Camera Bits Staff
  • Superhero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21711
    • View Profile
    • Camera Bits, Inc.
Re: customize the view of iptc stationary pad
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2007, 01:45:52 PM »
Brendan,

I guess I had this question already seen here, but I dont find it anymore...

How is it possible to make the IPTC Stationary pad smaller by masking some unused fields like some XMP-only-fields (not all!), Transmission Ref. etc...

You can use the "Classic IPTC dialogs" where all of those new items don't exist.  Just open up the IPTC/XMP tab of the Preferences dialog and set the "Use Classic IPTC dialogs" checkbox.

-Kirk

Offline Brendan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 358
    • View Profile
Re: customize the view of iptc stationary pad
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2007, 01:52:27 PM »
yes, I know this option, but I dont want use this!
For this reason I wrote "NOT ALL of the XMP fields..."

using the latest version of PM on win10

Offline Brendan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 358
    • View Profile
Re: customize the view of iptc stationary pad
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2007, 11:59:23 AM »
Kirk, any news? :)
using the latest version of PM on win10

Offline Kirk Baker

  • Senior Software Engineer
  • Camera Bits Staff
  • Superhero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21711
    • View Profile
    • Camera Bits, Inc.
Re: customize the view of iptc stationary pad
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2007, 06:55:37 PM »
Kirk, any news? :)

No.  As I said on a different thread, my main focus is getting a solid 4.5.3 version ready as soon as possible.  Features will have to wait.

-Kirk