Hi!
I'm running
Windows 7 Home Premium (64 bit).
By the way, although hardly any DAM tool supports XMP sidecars for video or other non-image files, why couldn't Photo Mechanic be the first?
As video asset management tools are really scarce or non-existent, I think this is really functionality needed by more and more users! It is hard to point any new camera model that wouldn't be marketed as HD video capable. I don't understand why video features aren't requested more among DAM tools! (Lightroom 4 beta seems to make some improments in this area...)
Isn't XMP marketed as format that can be used for ANY file type?
By using it via sidecars instead of embedding inside "parent" file has some clear advantages for a regular home user.- Fast backups to external hard drives, when only changed sidecar files have to be copied instead of huge video files.
- User can check XMP sidecars with simple text editor like Notepad to be sure, that data he has entered really is there. No need to understand database structures or cross check with other metadata capable software to see that embedded metadata is actually inside file. After all, it is user's data, not software vendor's data.
Disadvantage is that sidecars (usually) have to be moved, copied and deleted with their parent files. If a user isn't aware about this, problems arise. However if a user really is using a DAM tool, he can easily absorb philosophy of using them. This could be also advantage when sending your files away. By sending only the media file you could be sure that no personal metadata is sent inside it - no need to use software to "clean" media file from metadata.
As I don't know anything about software engineering, I don't know how much work it is to implement sidecar support.
But if a software already supports read+write of XMP sidecars for some file type (like RAW images), it feels like it shouldn't be a major feature to implement for other file types too? Of course I could be totally wrong about this!
-pb