When I do use Ingest Selection, it's because I'm having multiple shoots in one card, so needing to stop in every one to have to different selections and Ingest commands for for Tagged and Untagged sums up soon: like 10 different Ingest compared to 5. And, you can't just have Select Others as I'm having several different shoots that would now become selected – so that's not really as straight forward as you can make it sound.
Is there a valid reason for NOT have Ingest Selection copy protected files as does standard Ingest?
We'll have to think on this some more. I can't give you a definitive answer right now.
This may help: you can change the sort order to Arrangement, select your Tagged images, move them to the front then select your images and start the Ingest from Selection.
Thanks. I find it confusing that there's different behavior for Protected Files in standard Ingest and Ingest Selection as I can't understand the reasoning. I find Protected Files
always are more important to ingest the Unprotected: to be able to review, rate, label and add individual metadata while ingest is still going for the rest of the files.
Thanks for the suggestion getting Protected Files ingested first also in Ingest Selection, though would still need double Ingest Selection commands for each shoot: first for Tagged Files for each shoot, then for Untagged for each shoot. And, after ingesting all the Tagged files for each shoot, it's actually really inconvenient and slow to set the exact same settings again for each shoot for Untagged files (giving the exact same folder name and metadata preset for each ingest as with Tagged Files, ingest-by-ingest).
Looking forward for the Ingest Selection command getting Protected Files first (as with standard Ingest). Hope it happens, and soon!