Kirk
Obviously something is being missed by one of us in the communication- You stated in the original reply on January 6/21
"Use the Navigator to rename folders. To move folders, use drag and drop in the Navigator.
Both operations should keep the catalog(s) up to date on the changes."In your reply to me you state
"If the files really got moved and not copied, then that's a bug. You're certain that the files don't exist in their original location any longer?"Kirk - first you say to move files, use drag and drop in the Navigator and now, if I understand you, you say that if the files got moved then it's a bug.
?
Question - are we copying or moving or is there a way to do both? We should have the choice of either moving or copying files and folders.
You also state
"Can I ask what compels you to move folders around? The main purpose of a Catalog system is to make it easy to locate images no matter where they reside. You shouldn't have to move anything around and still find images with the same speed as someone who is meticulous about their folder layout."I know exactly what the purpose of a catalog is and you state it correctly. A caveat should be added, that the end user should seldom, if ever, have to step outside the database to input, extract, modify, copy, move or backup data - a holder over from my professional career. There are, however, as you say "meticulous" catalogs and those that are just a bunch of files with reference links such as how many people use their LR catalogs - dump everything in one big pot. I bet you some are doing the same thing with PM.
I have always held that even the best databases (catalogs) aren't without design flaws, broken links, corrupted files, misspelled or mis-linked keywords, improperly placed metadata or color or ratings tags that were yellow rather than green or 4 rather than 5. Not even garbage in garbage out - just an oversight, a typo or you forgot or misspelled the model or agency's name. Like a triple safe backup, having a "meticulous" folder system (along with the metadata, etal) - for me by date and place and then grouped by job or event is a fail safe. It gives me another option to quickly find folders and files by sight - often faster than doing a search.
As I have been transitioning from a Capture One and previously LR catalogs to PM+ I am seeing new folder groupings that would make my use of the PM+ catalog even more intuitive and fail safe. That is what compels me and what I was/am trying to do within PM+ to create even more fail safe groupings of folders.
Unfortunately, whether I try to organize within PM+ or in my OS it is very time consuming, to many steps to mess up and forget.
I wouldn't expect you to to everything my OS does and I am honestly blown away by the support you and your techs provide. I am very appreciative.
Suggestions - I could give you a list, however, dealing with the above just give us an easy to use multi file/multi folder drag and drop that supports both copying and moving. Between the navigator and organizer most of the needed file explorer / finder functions are there with the huge exception of the multi file drag and drop.
On bended knee I would also ask for more searchable exif data - I have logged that in the feature requests, however, if you don't ask you usually don't get.
Thanks in advance
Bob