« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 150% magnification instead of 800%?  (Read 8176 times)

Offline charlesteton

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
    • www.charlesteton.com
150% magnification instead of 800%?
« on: November 14, 2006, 05:21:16 AM »
Hi again Kirk,

I don't know what other people think about this request but 150% magnification would be a lot more handy for me than 800%.

I know 100% is all we need but...
Logged

Offline Kirk Baker

  • Senior Software Engineer
  • Camera Bits Staff
  • Superhero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25020
    • View Profile
    • Camera Bits, Inc.
Re: 150% magnification instead of 800%?
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2006, 05:36:46 AM »
Quote from: charlesteton on November 14, 2006, 05:21:16 AM
Hi again Kirk,

I don't know what other people think about this request but 150% magnification would be a lot more handy for me than 800%.

I know 100% is all we need but...

Is 200% not useful then?

-Kirk
Logged

Offline charlesteton

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
    • www.charlesteton.com
Re: 150% magnification instead of 800%?
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2006, 05:50:39 AM »
Haha... I thought you would ask, and I know I kept wishing for it but not why until I looked in the PM prefs. Because I've got PM set to show the embedded jpg for preview when viewing Canon RAW files they can look a bit pixelated for me at 200%. If that makes sense?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »