I'm running into an issue with the performance of a Live Ingest. I'm trying to develop a method whereby I can have a handful of photographers shoot using WiFi adapters on the camera, and transmit small JPEGs back to a central FTP server - and then use PM Live Ingest to rename the files, add IPTC data, and copy them to a new location for later use.
I shot a small event recently with a test config - just my two cameras and me as the sole photographer, transmitting back to my Macbook Pro. All images were saved on the local SSD. File stability monitoring was disabled. I shot the event over a course of 45 minutes. I shot a total of 1200 frames. All the files transmitted successfully to the laptop very quickly.
When the event finished, I returned to the laptop. Live Ingest was still working on images from the first 15 minutes of the event. I actually ingested all the RAW files off my cards, did my selects from the RAW files, and transmitted final images before Live Ingest finished what is essentially a file copy (with IPTC additions - something PM tends to do very quickly).
So - am I doing something wrong here? Is there a slow down in Live Ingest that prevents me from trying to use it this way?
In the end, this is similar in concept to what the AP and Getty were doing at the Olympics, but I have no idea what their actual workflow is - if someone has a clue, I'd love some more knowledge on it!
Thanks!
Dave